Corrugated hose vs. triflex® alternative

Robot cable management on triflex vs corrugated hose

Which robot cable management approach is better for your application?

A £350 replacement could end up costing far more than £350. Here's why.

Replacement components

Engineering time

Production downtime

Lost productivity

ConsiderationCorrugated hosetriflex® cable management
Initial costTypically lower upfront costHigher initial investment
Defined bend radiusNo defined minimum bend radiusDefined bend-radius options by chain size
Multi-axis movementCan be affected by torsional movementDesigned for robotic multi-axis movement
Cable accessTypically accessed from the endsSelected ranges offer external cable insertion
Length adjustmentCut to shortenModular links can be added or removed
Localised repairDamaged hose sections generally require complete replacementIndividual chain links can be replaced

Why robot cable management matters

  • Movement - Robot applications can combine bending, twisting and multi-axis movement. Cable management needs to accommodate the motion of the application.
  • Cable protection - Routing, separation, bend radius and strain relief can influence the mechanical load placed on cables and hoses.
  • Maintenance - Access, replacement method and the ability to adapt a system can affect service time when a cable management component needs attention.

Corrugated hose and triflex® solve the same problem in different ways

Corrugated hose

triflex® cable management

Corrugated hose vs triflex® FAQs

Robot Cable Management - triflex® R Dresspacks
Robot cable management
Torsional cables
Robot cables
Configure your robot dresspack
Whitepaper: six axes
Whitepaper: triflex® vs corrugated hose

Consulting

I look forward to answering your questions

Shipping and consultation